They did not step on it with two feet absent a plan to do so.Īnd the decision to do so dusted off the various arguments in support of keeping the name, many of which misrepresent or overlook the positions of Native American leadership - and all of which ignore the fact that the word is a dictionary-defined slur, regardless of intent when using it.īut here’s the reality. With majority owner Josh Harris using it multiple times in an address to fans and prominent limited partner Magic Johnson tweeting it, it would be naive to regard the gesture as spontaneous. If it’s not a shift, it’s possibly an effort to see whether a shift would be embraced or shunned. “Making a historical reference to watching and rooting for does not signify a shift nor does it change the reasons for dropping the name.” “For nearly 90 years, this franchise had a different name, and fans and our new owners alike have fond memories of cheering for that team and watching it win three Super Bowls,” the spokesperson said. Via Matthew Paras of the Washington Times, a Commanders spokesperson downplayed the possibility that casual use of the name by multiple members of the new ownership group represents a possible first step toward bringing it back. Some have wondered whether it’s a trial balloon aimed at gauging reaction to the possibility of bringing it back. Without Eric Stokes, Jaire Alexander, and Rasul Douglas playing in the preseason, that leaves the Packers with only five active cornerbacks on game day.New ownership of the Commanders has not been bashful about using the franchise’s abandoned name. Lastly, and as I mentioned last week when trying to figure out who could be cut, we have to consider whether the position group can handle losing a player or two.Ī prime example of this right now is at cornerback. Just about all of these back-end of the roster openings will be determined by special teams contributions. If a player isn’t popping on the offensive or defensive sides of the ball, that doesn’t necessarily mean they are going to be cut. The receiver position could quickly become a crowded room for the Packers if Christian Watson and Danny Davis are able to return to practice this week and participate in Thursday’s game.Įven with Sammy Watkins, Allen Lazard, and Randall Cobb sitting out, that would leave the Packers with eight available receivers. The recently signed Fulgham would be the most likely cut candidate from this position group.Īnother factor to consider is special teams, which plays an important role in these decisions as well. He played just five total snaps against New Orleans, the fewest on the offensive side of the ball, and even seeing fewer reps than tight end Nate Becker and wide receiver Travis Fulgham, both of whom were signed just days before the game. Sal Cannella at tight end falls into this category as well. With Menet and Clary not seeing much of the field, this could make either - or both - expendable. The Packers have four centers listed on their roster, and that doesn’t include Zach Tom or Elgton Jenkins, both of whom could play there if needed. Against the Saints, Michal Menet and Tyler Clary each played just six snaps. The interior defensive line room has proven to be quite deep for this Packers team, so that could make parting with UDFA Akial Byers a possibility, as he was inactive against New Orleans.Ī second potential sign of an incoming cut is playing time. As far as who the Packers could move on from this time around, well, that’s always the big question.Ī few potential tell-tale signs of an incoming cut could be a fringe roster player who is battling an injury. The only healthy players remaining at that position are Adrian Amos - who won’t play in the final preseason game - Micah Abernathy, Shawn Davis, and De’Vante Cross. Similar to last Tuesday, the Packers could end up cutting more than five players because of addition, specifically at the safety position.Īs of now, Darnell Savage, Vernon Scott, Dallin Leavitt, Innis Gaines, and Tariq Carpenter are all sidelined with injuries. The players that were released were Randy Ramsey, Donte Vaughn, Cole Schneider, Dominique Dafney, BJ Baylor, George Moore, and Ellis Brooks. In order to get to the 85-player maximum last week, the Packers actually made seven total cuts because they also had two additions–safety De’Vante Cross and tight end Nate Becker. Now, this coming Tuesday, rosters have to be at 80 players by 3:00 CST. Last Tuesday, the Green Bay Packers, along with the rest of the NFL, had to trim their rosters from 90 players down to 85.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |